Archive for Lafayette Sports Fan Forum This forum is not affiliated in any way with Lafayette College, Lafayette College Athletics, The Maroon Club or any other official organization. Please be respectful of other posters as well as the athletes, coaches and administrators.
 


       Lafayette Sports Fan Forum Forum Index -> Whatever else
Lafalum

What teams would you say are fully or adequately funded?

Football between donations and scholarships they are there now.
Basketball men's and women's maybe short one or two scholarships
Lacrosse strong donor support on both teams women's full funded on scholarships
Field Hockey- good donor support fully funded on scholarships
Soccer- good donor support and fully funded on scholarships for both teams
Baseball- good donor support weak on scholarships
Tennis, Track and Field, Fencing- no school support some support on donor side
Volley ball- increasing scholarship support ( I am hearing ultimately four)

So there you have it...what else can be done and why aren't results better. Let's hear from the " study." One month to go!!
Kpard

Is it a lack of coaching accountability and funding for quality assistant coaches?
BPard

I posted about individual teams before (like this thread about MLax. Here's a look at Lafayette's spending compared to the PL in 2015 according to Equity in Athletics:

    Recruiting:  97% of League Average (we are way under average on women's recruiting, and slightly over on men's)
    Athletic Aid (Men): 97% of League Average
    Athletic Aid (Women): 63% of League Average (3rd least in league)
    Athletic Aid (Combined): 80% of League Average (3rd least in League, $2m below avg)
    Operating Expenses: 68% of League Average (3rd least in League, $1m below avg)
    Grand Total Expenses: 78% of League Average (3rd least in League, $5m below avg)
    Athletic Spending per Student: 140% of League Average (3rd most in league)
    Athletic Spending per Student-Athlete: 82% of League Average (3rd least in league)


Looks to me like the women are unfunded across the board.

Athletic Aid isn't broken out by team. Looking at team operating expenses and total expenses, the following teams are close to fully funded, not accounting for aid (within 5% of league average of total team expenses in 2015): baseball (5%), football(-16%), women's basketball (2%), women's lacrosse (-5%), men's tennis (-6%), field hockey (-6%). Negative numbers mean we spend more than average. These are the only sports where that is true.

Remember, we spend 32% less than the league average on operating costs.

Growing the size of the College will only help if a portion of tuition is allocated towards athletics. Given our inability to get performance at bargain basement prices, allocating a portion of tuition revenue growth towards athletics must happen for us to be competitive in the League.

It will take a $3m increase (15% over 2015 budget) to close the gap in aid and operating expenses to bring us up to the league average.
Andy

BPard wrote:
I posted about individual teams before (like this thread about MLax. Here's a look at Lafayette's spending compared to the PL in 2015 according to Equity in Athletics:

    Recruiting:  97% of League Average (we are way under average on women's recruiting, and slightly over on men's)
    Athletic Aid (Men): 97% of League Average
    Athletic Aid (Women): 63% of League Average (3rd least in league)
    Athletic Aid (Combined): 80% of League Average (3rd least in League, $2m below avg)
    Operating Expenses: 68% of League Average (3rd least in League, $1m below avg)
    Grand Total Expenses: 78% of League Average (3rd least in League, $5m below avg)
    Athletic Spending per Student: 140% of League Average (3rd most in league)
    Athletic Spending per Student-Athlete: 82% of League Average (3rd least in league)


Looks to me like the women are unfunded across the board.

Athletic Aid isn't broken out by team. Looking at team operating expenses and total expenses, the following teams are close to fully funded, not accounting for aid (within 5% of league average of total team expenses in 2015): baseball (5%), football(-16%), women's basketball (2%), women's lacrosse (-5%), men's tennis (-6%), field hockey (-6%). Negative numbers mean we spend more than average. These are the only sports where that is true.

Remember, we spend 32% less than the league average on operating costs.

Growing the size of the College will only help if a portion of tuition is allocated towards athletics. Given our inability to get performance at bargain basement prices, allocating a portion of tuition revenue growth towards athletics must happen for us to be competitive in the League.

It will take a $3m increase (15% over 2015 budget) to close the gap in aid and operating expenses to bring us up to the league average.



Overall expenses for football is a hard one to figure. I don't think anyone believes we grant more scholarship equivalencies than Lehigh or Colgate, yet the expense figures are LC 5.6 mil vs LU 4.9mil. Gate 5.628 vs LC 5.622. Even when we were in the midst of budget cuts (42 equivs), our expense figure was in the top 3 or 4 in the PL. I suspect our number includes expensing the stadium renovation, but I'm not an insider. Recall Zeus's post re "resources" vs aid (presumably what he was getting at).
RichH

Different accounting methods. Very hard to accurately estimate actual funds spent.  Stadium expenses may indeed be an AD expense. Other schools put those expenses under Facilities upkeep.  My bet is Pards darn close to max now with this class. A damn good class.
Andy

RichH wrote:
Different accounting methods. Very hard to accurately estimate actual funds spent.  Stadium expenses may indeed be an AD expense. Other schools put those expenses under Facilities upkeep.  My bet is Pards darn close to max now with this class. A damn good class.


Thanks, Rich. We're interested in seeing what this staff can do with a full cycle.  

NCAA could make it a lot easier on us by listing "athletically related aid" per sport.
RichH

Oh NCAA would never deprive its members with such a neat fudge factor. Transparency is not in their genetic makeup Smile
SixtyEighter

I spoke to the father of a golf team member who struck me as very credible. Based on his comments I think it is safe to say that the golf team is grossly underfunded.
BPard

SixtyEighter wrote:
I spoke to the father of a golf team member who struck me as very credible. Based on his comments I think it is safe to say that the golf team is grossly underfunded.
We spend 32% less than the league average golf operating expenses. 38% less than average golf total expenses. For 2015.

On the broader trend, since 2003, we have given less aid than the PL average for men in every year EXCEPT 2008 and 2009, when combined we gave $1M more than league average for men's aid. In 2010, we gave $80k less than the league average.

So ESPECIALLY during the austerity measures, the men's teams were MUCH better positioned for student aid funding compared to league average.

The women have been chronically underfunded. To give you an idea of the size of the difference, for men since 2003, we spent an aggregate $3.3M less than league average but for women, we spent an aggregate $16M less than the league average for women.

Compared to the rest of the Patriot League, our support of women's athletics is pathetic.
pards123

BPard wrote:
I posted about individual teams before (like this thread about MLax. Here's a look at Lafayette's spending compared to the PL in 2015 according to Equity in Athletics:

    Recruiting:  97% of League Average (we are way under average on women's recruiting, and slightly over on men's)
    Athletic Aid (Men): 97% of League Average
    Athletic Aid (Women): 63% of League Average (3rd least in league)
    Athletic Aid (Combined): 80% of League Average (3rd least in League, $2m below avg)
    Operating Expenses: 68% of League Average (3rd least in League, $1m below avg)
    Grand Total Expenses: 78% of League Average (3rd least in League, $5m below avg)
    Athletic Spending per Student: 140% of League Average (3rd most in league)
    Athletic Spending per Student-Athlete: 82% of League Average (3rd least in league)


Looks to me like the women are unfunded across the board.

Athletic Aid isn't broken out by team. Looking at team operating expenses and total expenses, the following teams are close to fully funded, not accounting for aid (within 5% of league average of total team expenses in 2015): baseball (5%), football(-16%), women's basketball (2%), women's lacrosse (-5%), men's tennis (-6%), field hockey (-6%). Negative numbers mean we spend more than average. These are the only sports where that is true.

Remember, we spend 32% less than the league average on operating costs.

Growing the size of the College will only help if a portion of tuition is allocated towards athletics. Given our inability to get performance at bargain basement prices, allocating a portion of tuition revenue growth towards athletics must happen for us to be competitive in the League.

It will take a $3m increase (15% over 2015 budget) to close the gap in aid and operating expenses to bring us up to the league average.


I don't care what the numbers say, there is absolutely no way we spend more than league average in tennis. Only possible explanation is the expense for indoor court cost as Lehigh, Army and Navy have their own indoor facilities
Andy

BPard wrote:


On the broader trend, since 2003, we have given less aid than the PL average for men in every year EXCEPT 2008 and 2009, when combined we gave $1M more than league average for men's aid. In 2010, we gave $80k less than the league average.

So ESPECIALLY during the austerity measures, the men's teams were MUCH better positioned for student aid funding compared to league average.


As an outsider I thought Weiss's budget cuts were in reaction to the market crash of '08-'09.  Austerity measures seem to be reflected in the very small football recruiting class (17) of spring 2009.  The lower athletic aid figures would have accompanied that class (Tavani stated there were 2 recruiting classes affected).

Men's Athletically Related Student Aid

Lafayette.......................................Lehigh

'09 - $4.372mil                              $4.842mil
'10 - $4.073                                   $5.718
'11 - $4.057                                   $5.784                                    
'12 - $3.948                                   $5.448
'13 - $4.061                                   $5.800

2015 Men's Athletically Related Student Aid

Colgate  $6.405mil   (hockey, no baseball)
BU         $6.070        (hockey, no baseball)
HC         $6.058      (hockey)
Leh        $5.887      (wrestling)
Buck       $5.592      (wrestling, water polo!)
LC          $4.951
Loy        $2,626    (no football)
AU          $2,128  (no football)
BPard

pards123 wrote:
I don't care what the numbers say, there is absolutely no way we spend more than league average in tennis. Only possible explanation is the expense for indoor court cost as Lehigh, Army and Navy have their own indoor facilities

You're right in that for "tennis" meaning combined men's and women's, we spend $150k less than average. But again, it's the women's team that gets the short end of the stick compared to league average. The men are at least in the same ballpark in spending as the rest of the league. The women aren't.

This data doesn't include the military academies. For men's tennis:
Boston University $67,187
Bucknell University $196,991
Colgate University $139,922
College of the Holy Cross $42,728
Fordham University $73,060
Georgetown University $124,121
Lafayette College $111,878
Lehigh University $119,416
Loyola University Maryland $79,036

For women:
Boston University $680,144
Bucknell University $250,803
Colgate University $119,198
College of the Holy Cross $49,876
Fordham University $609,234
Georgetown University $162,092
Lafayette College $109,871
Lehigh University $214,672
Loyola University Maryland $201,437

       Lafayette Sports Fan Forum Forum Index -> Whatever else
Page 1 of 1
Create your own free forum | Buy a domain to use with your forum