Faternities - lafayettesports.myfreeforum.org



lafayettesports.myfreeforum.org Forum Index


lafayettesports.myfreeforum.org > Whatever else > 
--- Faternities

Reply to topic

Must be logged in to watch topics

Posted:

Please Register and Login to this forum to stop seeing this advertsing.













  
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 8:04 am

LafalumView user's profile






Joined: 06 Mar 2007
Posts: 843







I  just got an email from the alumni president of our fraternity with an explanation of the frat situation. This is rubbish!!  The college is judging frats on a system called compass. It takes into account several factors. Despite the fact that our house is close to or at the all college average in GPA and above the all male average we get 0 out 40 points which puts us on the marginal catagory.
The biggest outrage is that the all male average is 25-40  points below women. WHAT's going on here??? If it were the reverse we'd have a government investigation. This bloated overpaid administration can't take the time to do some serious analysis tells me there is an agenda a work.

Reply with quote
  
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 9:06 am

Franks TanksView user's profile






Joined: 23 Mar 2007
Posts: 532







Lafalum wrote:
I  just got an email from the alumni president of our fraternity with an explanation of the frat situation. This is rubbish!!  The college is judging frats on a system called compass. It takes into account several factors. Despite the fact that our house is close to or at the all college average in GPA and above the all male average we get 0 out 40 points which puts us on the marginal catagory.
The biggest outrage is that the all male average is 25-40  points below women. WHAT's going on here??? If it were the reverse we'd have a government investigation. This bloated overpaid administration can't take the time to do some serious analysis tells me there is an agenda a work.


The student conduct committee has recommneded that the BOT should revoke Phi Gamme Delta's charter because a few guys were caught drinking beer on the 3rd floor of the house (the horror).  Fiji is probably gone and I suspect the college will do everything possible to rid itself of the remaining frats in the next 10-15 years.  Frats have a long history at Lafayette and have been essential to the Lafayette culture, the current Pres and BOT wants to simply destroy everything.

Reply with quote
  
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 10:09 am

TheTruthView user's profile






Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 485







Franks Tanks:  don't forget Fiji is supposed to be dry....this was mandated by the national.   I don't think 3 guys drinking beer in the fraternity warrants kicking them off campus even if it is against the franternites rules.  I'd be interested in hearing if there were other violations over the past year or so to warrant this action.  there must be more to the story...I hope.  I do know there is an anti-fraternity sentiment in the faculty and now the administration.

Lafalum:  did they explain what goes into this "compass" rating system?  It must be something new.  It's hard for me to believe that a fraternity would score "0" points if the process was properly explained and communicated.

Reply with quote
  
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 11:12 am

LafalumView user's profile






Joined: 06 Mar 2007
Posts: 843







It is a whole list of things too long to post here but I understand that D'Orio ( the asst dean in charge of Housing) gave the greeks one week to review the scoring system in March. In our case the undergrad responsible for submitting the report never submitted it and we were scored 0. The school made no effort to contact our alumni board and to this day refused to meet with us and any alumni representative of the greek system. IF filled out we might have been at least satisfactory and maybe even excellent.

But it all points to slopiness in the Dean's office which is more agenda driven than with any desire to find out the truth. Unfortunately true in many aspects of student life management by this admistration and BOT.

Reply with quote
  
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 11:40 am

Franks TanksView user's profile






Joined: 23 Mar 2007
Posts: 532







TheTruth wrote:
Franks Tanks:  don't forget Fiji is supposed to be dry....this was mandated by the national.   I don't think 3 guys drinking beer in the fraternity warrants kicking them off campus even if it is against the franternites rules.  I'd be interested in hearing if there were other violations over the past year or so to warrant this action.  there must be more to the story...I hope.  I do know there is an anti-fraternity sentiment in the faculty and now the administration.

Lafalum:  did they explain what goes into this "compass" rating system?  It must be something new.  It's hard for me to believe that a fraternity would score "0" points if the process was properly explained and communicated.


Sure Fiji is dry but the incident was not a fraternity sponsored event. If a few 21 year old guys who live in the house are drinking beer, without the consent or sponsorship from the fraternity, what is the issue. I believe the same issue happened twice and these are the only recent issues. Yes Fiji national should be brough in to reprimand, but the only rule broken here was a national frat rule.

Reply with quote
  
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:20 pm

TheTruthView user's profile






Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 485







So it's the argument that if something bad happens, then it's individuals that did it.  If something good happens, it's about brotherhood and togethernes.

Would the Fiji national be willing to reprimand and discipline these 3 individuals?  And since it has happened on two other occasions, it's considered  trend.  So shouldn't the entire house suffer for not abiding by the rules?

I'm playing devil's advocate Frank's Tanks.  I do believe the rules are set up for the fraternities to fail.  I do believe the faculty and now administration wants to get rid of fraternities.  I just wish Weiss and the BOT would have the guts to come out and make the decision instead of these BS tactics.  

In Lafalum's case, if the undergrads did not submit a plan, all Annette had to do is send an e-mail to the alumni representative and say, "the undergraduates of XYZ fraternity did not submit the necessary report and will recieve a zero and rated as "marginal".  Please contact me at your earliest convenience so we can discuss."  In fact, Annette can use what I jsut wrote if she likes.

Communication, communication, communication.  it really is this simple.

Reply with quote
  
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:25 am

Franks TanksView user's profile






Joined: 23 Mar 2007
Posts: 532







TheTruth wrote:
So it's the argument that if something bad happens, then it's individuals that did it.  If something good happens, it's about brotherhood and togethernes.

Would the Fiji national be willing to reprimand and discipline these 3 individuals?  And since it has happened on two other occasions, it's considered  trend.  So shouldn't the entire house suffer for not abiding by the rules?

I'm playing devil's advocate Frank's Tanks.  I do believe the rules are set up for the fraternities to fail.  I do believe the faculty and now administration wants to get rid of fraternities.  I just wish Weiss and the BOT would have the guts to come out and make the decision instead of these BS tactics.  



In Lafalum's case, if the undergrads did not submit a plan, all Annette had to do is send an e-mail to the alumni representative and say, "the undergraduates of XYZ fraternity did not submit the necessary report and will recieve a zero and rated as "marginal".  Please contact me at your earliest convenience so we can discuss."  In fact, Annette can use what I jsut wrote if she likes.

Communication, communication, communication.  it really is this simple.



Truth-- I get what you are saying but there is no way a fraternity can police a zero tolerance policy on alcohol.  As 21 yo is allowed to drink beer in his dorm room but not his frat room-- a bit strange and not really plausible to expect.  Also I believe Fiji national should reprimand the frat if they broke national policy, not the individuals. Fiji broke a national policy and should then take their medicine from national, but IMO no schools rules were broken as a small group of men who were of age were having a few beers in their rooms/common area.  If that is criteria for ending a 125 year relationship then so be it, but dont tell me that it makes sense.  I lot of Fiji alum do very well and were involved in athletics.  I know of a few recent alums who have made handsome contributions to the FB program and they also care about Fiji a great deal.  I would suspect they would think twice about giving to the school again, even if it does help the FB team.

So overall yes I believe Fiji should be punished in some manner, but kicking them off campus is quite a drastic move for a very minor "crime."  However, it is clear the school has an agenda and every frat will be gone in 10-15 years.  It's sad but the admin is hell bent on ruining some of the best aspects of Lafayette, and some factors that make it unique.  Also many alums are simply fed-up with the way important institutiuons have been treated (their frat or old team for example) and will not pony up bucks when Weiss comes calling.

Reply with quote
  
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:46 am

The MaroonView user's profile






Joined: 23 Feb 2007
Posts: 459


Location: Bethlehem, PA





I can't remember why, but I found myself doing surveys of alumni at some point in school. One of the questions was what was enjoyed most about the "Lafayette Experience" and the overwhelming majority of responses were things related to being in a fraternity. I know some people that skip their class reunions but never miss a fraternity reunion. I was independant and some could even argue "anti Greek" as a student---but there was no getting around the loyalty the alums felt toward the school.

I have to believe this will have a long-term negative affect on giving.
_________________
I bleed Maroon

Reply with quote
  
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 9:56 am

TheTruthView user's profile






Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 485







Franks tank:  I agree this is a pretty minor infraction to kick a fraternity off campus.  I remember the days when you could walk across campus with a cup of beer and wave hello to security.  I think that level of drinking was dangerous and out of control, what's going on now is just as bad.  

I have seen and experienced first hand, colleges that have embraced the Greek system and made it an asset to the campus culture.  you still have issues (and you always will with 18-22 year olds) but it is under control and the rules are spelled out.  

maroon:  You won't see it in the overall dollar amounts because we have so many alumni and parents capable and willing to write big checks to the school.  Where you see it is in the number of donors to the College.  It has continually dropped.  More importanlty, this issue with fraternities affects the classes in the late 70's to mid 90's.  These classes are nearing their peak earning years with the older classes finishing with sending their kids to college.  There is a huge disconnect with this era of alumni that the college, if it continues operating with this veil of secrecy, will not reach.  I had a long conversation with an alumni who graduated in 1980.  He refuses to give to the College because he doesn't recognize Lafayette anymore.  It is an issue.

Reply with quote
  
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:42 am

LafalumView user's profile






Joined: 06 Mar 2007
Posts: 843







TheTruth wrote:
   this issue with fraternities affects the classes in the late 70's to mid 90's.  These classes are nearing their peak earning years with the older classes finishing with sending their kids to college.  There is a huge disconnect with this era of alumni that the college, if it continues operating with this veil of secrecy, will not reach.  I had a long conversation with an alumni who graduated in 1980.  He refuses to give to the College because he doesn't recognize Lafayette anymore.  It is an issue.


Believe me it is an issue for the 50's and 60's too. I do not trust the school to take my estate issues seriously. We are about to have one of the largest transfers of generational wealth in history and between the arrogance of the faculty, the chicanery of the administration and the cluelessness of the BOT, Lafayette will be scrambling and failing to raise the money it will need in the next ten years. There is NO WAY IN HELL there could be a successful 400 mio dollar campaign in the next 5 years!!
It really saddens me because I thought Weis would lead us to better things but he is a willing stooge to a dufuss Board and a selfish faculty.


Reply with quote
  
Reply to topic Page 1 of 3
Page 1, 2, 3  Next
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Jump to:  
All times are GMT - 5 Hours

The time now is Fri Dec 18, 2009 7:19 pm

phpvBB - lafayettesports.myfreeforum.org - Top - MODs

Card File  Gallery  Forum Archive
Visit Justinsanity.net for all your phpvBB needs.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group.
Create your own free forum | Buy a domain to use with your forum