Byerly Addresses the "study" in web presentation - Lafayette Sports Fan Forum



Lafayette Sports Fan Forum Forum Index


Lafayette Sports Fan Forum > Whatever else > 
--- Byerly Addresses the "study" in web presentation

Reply to topic

Must be logged in to watch topics

Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 6:50 am

LafalumView user's profile






Joined: 06 Mar 2007
Posts: 3916







In a live video which looked like a commercial for the new plan to increase the size of the school, the last last few  minutes were devoted to the study. I suspect given the number of questions she had to spend the time on it. Point one, she said we are staying in division one and the Patriot League. Point two she admitted she had no experience with Division one athletics and athletic scholarships. Point three, like any other activity at the school she wanted to use a consultant to evaluate how we are using our assets and scholarships and how to use them more effectively.

I am not sure she realizes that major surgery is needed administratively. On the other hand it could be cover for what she may suspect needs to be done, but she needs confirmation. My question is  the make up of the committee may preclude revealing the solution needed. My hope is she meets directly with the consultant alone.

The two alumni reps I have heard are Cindy Linville and Fran Mustaro. We did not learn who the others are. A final report is due April 15.

 Reply with quote
  
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 7:48 am

ed65View user's profile






Joined: 04 Sep 2013
Posts: 884


Location: New York City





Alison put to rest the DIII nonsense in her address last night.  She said "The Patriot League is where we want to be."  I hope the cynics on the Board will finally stop talking about DIII.  The school would be crazy to take that giant step backward.  D-I is one of the things that distinguishes us from the horde of "liberal arts" schools in PA and the Northeast.  Other than the PL and Ivies, name another one.

Reply with quote
  
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 11:44 am

LC FanView user's profile






Joined: 03 Oct 2007
Posts: 136







As Lafalum notes, last night's event was an infomercial for the campaign and for year end giving. There was zero meat. All of the answers to the layup questions have been heard a thousand times. Athletics was an after thought. It shouldn't be. We don't need a study to know that a meat cleaver is needed. We don't need a study to hold coaches accountable. We don't need a study to know that the administration has failed in athletics. And, we don't need a study to know that Lafayette sports fans are sick and tired of losing.

Reply with quote
  
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 2:32 pm

ed65View user's profile






Joined: 04 Sep 2013
Posts: 884


Location: New York City





LC Fan wrote:
As Lafalum notes, last night's event was an infomercial for the campaign and for year end giving. There was zero meat. All of the answers to the layup questions have been heard a thousand times. Athletics was an after thought. It shouldn't be. We don't need a study to know that a meat cleaver is needed. We don't need a study to hold coaches accountable. We don't need a study to know that the administration has failed in athletics. And, we don't need a study to know that Lafayette sports fans are sick and tired of losing.


Well said LC Fan.  We know you are 100% right - now we hopefully will have a study that proves it.

Reply with quote
  
Posted: Wed Nov 16, 2016 9:11 am

LeopardBall10View user's profile






Joined: 23 Oct 2009
Posts: 291







Does the April 15th completion date bother anyone else? I understand these types of things take time to do well, and I am sure our consultant posters can give more detail, but that timing really puts fall sports in a bad spot. Any changes as directed by the study would occur in the summer of 2017, just a few months before camp.
_________________
"Pride, Purpose, Passion!"

Reply with quote
  
Posted: Wed Nov 16, 2016 9:29 am

LafalumView user's profile






Joined: 06 Mar 2007
Posts: 3916







LeopardBall10 wrote:
Does the April 15th completion date bother anyone else? I understand these types of things take time to do well, and I am sure our consultant posters can give more detail, but that timing really puts fall sports in a bad spot. Any changes as directed by the study would occur in the summer of 2017, just a few months before camp.


Any date would do the same thing for winter sports, spring sports etc. The purpose of the study is to improve our competitive position...a good thing...if followed through on.

Reply with quote
  
Posted: Wed Nov 16, 2016 1:41 pm

leopard88View user's profile






Joined: 17 May 2012
Posts: 375







Since this is the "Whatever Else" part of the forum and I also have not had a chance to watch the video . . .

. . . what did she have to say, if anything, about the other big topics of the day (i.e., expansion of the student body, the new buildings on McCartney Street, the elevator)?

Reply with quote
  
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2017 4:46 pm

AndyView user's profile






Joined: 23 Feb 2007
Posts: 6148







https://news.lafayette.edu/2017/0...ter&utm_medium=social%20media


Reply with quote
  
Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2017 4:03 pm

Bogus MegapardusView user's profile






Joined: 13 Oct 2009
Posts: 5880


Location: The Psphere of Pardsvillian Punditry





Another option might have been to choose an aesthetically pleasant design instead - one that would blend with existing college buildings and the surrounding neighborhood.

But I suppose that's asking too much theses days.

To me, they look like those bad ski resort time-share condos that nobody wants to buy. Does anybody realize how silly and dated those structures will look in fifteen years? Seriously - do you remember when people thought the New Jersey McMansion was an inspired design?

If they keep this up, College Hill will look like Downtown Disney World.

Reply with quote
  
Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2017 4:22 pm

pardfanView user's profile






Joined: 07 Sep 2014
Posts: 404







Bogus Megapardus wrote:
Another option might have been to choose an aesthetically pleasant design instead - one that would blend with existing college buildings and the surrounding neighborhood.

But I suppose that's asking too much theses days.

To me, they look like those bad ski resort time-share condos that nobody wants to buy. Does anybody realize how silly and dated those structures will look in fifteen years? Seriously - do you remember when people thought the New Jersey McMansion was an inspired design?

If they keep this up, College Hill will look like Downtown Disney World.


This administration seems to have a "itchy trigger finger" when it comes to spending money.  Aesthetics?  Blending?  Huh.

Reply with quote
  
Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2017 4:30 pm

Bogus MegapardusView user's profile






Joined: 13 Oct 2009
Posts: 5880


Location: The Psphere of Pardsvillian Punditry





It can be done properly, folks . . .  

Harvard Square, Cambridge:



Palmer Square, Princeton:

Reply with quote
  
Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2017 5:07 pm

Bogus MegapardusView user's profile






Joined: 13 Oct 2009
Posts: 5880


Location: The Psphere of Pardsvillian Punditry





Also you can see in those designs the concessions to the police and fire lobby - rounded street corners, deep curb cuts and pavement wide enough to fit a six-lane interstate highway. Those buildings will contain zero wood products or other combustible materials and will not catch fire. They do not need huge streets that justify the huge emergency vehicles their department wants the city to buy.

Please resist the temptation! Just stop it! Keep the streets narrow, the corners square and the facades varied. Consider making all streets one-way, including Cattell and McCartney. Keep everything on a human, pedestrian scale. At least try to make it fun and interesting, which that design most decidedly is not.

Also, instead of the obsession with "signage" everywhere, do what municipalities all over Quebec do - fresh flowers hanging from all the lamp posts. It adds a touch that can't be duplicated with synthetics.

Reply with quote
  
Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2017 6:19 pm

pardfanView user's profile






Joined: 07 Sep 2014
Posts: 404







Bogus Megapardus wrote:
Also you can see in those designs the concessions to the police and fire lobby - rounded street corners, deep curb cuts and pavement wide enough to fit a six-lane interstate highway. Those buildings will contain zero wood products or other combustible materials and will not catch fire. They do not need huge streets that justify the huge emergency vehicles their department wants the city to buy.

Please resist the temptation! Just stop it! Keep the streets narrow, the corners square and the facades varied. Consider making all streets one-way, including Cattell and McCartney. Keep everything on a human, pedestrian scale. At least try to make it fun and interesting, which that design most decidedly is not.

Also, instead of the obsession with "signage" everywhere, do what municipalities all over Quebec do - fresh flowers hanging from all the lamp posts. It adds a touch that can't be duplicated with synthetics.


Hopefully, we're not doing all this "on the cheap" so we have resources to do the important stuff like the elevator. Use that 2-4 mln that we seem willing to devote to the elevator and do the buildings right.

Reply with quote
  
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2017 9:18 am

leopard88View user's profile






Joined: 17 May 2012
Posts: 375







Bogus Megapardus wrote:
Also you can see in those designs the concessions to the police and fire lobby - rounded street corners, deep curb cuts and pavement wide enough to fit a six-lane interstate highway. Those buildings will contain zero wood products or other combustible materials and will not catch fire. They do not need huge streets that justify the huge emergency vehicles their department wants the city to buy.

Please resist the temptation! Just stop it! Keep the streets narrow, the corners square and the facades varied. Consider making all streets one-way, including Cattell and McCartney. Keep everything on a human, pedestrian scale. At least try to make it fun and interesting, which that design most decidedly is not.

Also, instead of the obsession with "signage" everywhere, do what municipalities all over Quebec do - fresh flowers hanging from all the lamp posts. It adds a touch that can't be duplicated with synthetics.


I generally agree with all of your points except this one.  Turning Cattell and McCartney Streets into one way streets would put thru traffic onto McCartney, which I believe presents two problems --

1.  Traffic volume on McCartney would increase significantly, which would reduce the human scale and make it more dangerous for pedestrians.

2.  More traffic would be added to the already difficult intersection of McCartney, College Avenue and the lower end of South College Drive.

Reply with quote
  
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2017 10:45 am

AndyView user's profile






Joined: 23 Feb 2007
Posts: 6148







Bogie, so true, pretty funny!

"To me, they look like those bad ski resort time-share condos that nobody wants to buy."



Reply with quote
  
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2017 8:56 am

Spardicus80View user's profile






Joined: 19 Oct 2016
Posts: 26







Have to agree with Bogie on this one.  This reminds me of public housing that you would find in Nuremberg, Germany - perfectly utilitarian and sterile, but nondescript and boring.  It simply has no character, lacks charm, and looks totally uninviting.  Where, for example, is the street lighting?  What about outdoor public seating and other spaces? You want to invite public activity and promote discourse and commerce. Finally, I don't see a tree anywhere.  Trees provide color and shade, and create a feel of openness and freshness.

The idea is to attract the best students.  Imagine a prospective student and his/her parents seeing this concept for the first time.  Not a very favorable first impression.  I think we can do much better.

Reply with quote
  
Reply to topic Page 1 of 1
 Previous Thread | Next Thread 

Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Jump to:  
All times are GMT - 5 Hours

The time now is Thu Aug 17, 2017 4:27 pm

phpvBB - Lafayette Sports Fan Forum - Top - MODs

Card File  Gallery  Forum Archive
Visit Justinsanity.net for all your phpvBB needs.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group.
Create your own free forum | Buy a domain to use with your forum